AllAble vs Profound 2026: AI Visibility Depth vs Execution

AllAble

On the live AllAble pricing page, every tier is published with no sales call: Pro at EUR 99 per month, Business at EUR 199 and Scale at EUR 399, or EUR 83, 166 and 333 as the annual-equivalent rate when you pay yearly at EUR 990, 1,990 and 3,990. Credits are 2,500, 6,000 and 15,000 per month, they roll over, and top-ups run at EUR 0.05 per credit. Each tier includes 1 user, 3 projects and 3 free guest seats, and the FAQ states no contracts and no cancellation fees. The part that matters for this page: the AI visibility module is part of the plan rather than a second product you buy. You are not adding an AEO subscription next to your keyword research, your content pipeline, your ads work and your reporting. It all sits under one number, which is why the honest argument here is not that AllAble is cheaper. At EUR 99 against Profound's USD 99 it is not. It is that you are paying once for a platform instead of twice for two halves of the same job.

Pprofound

Profound's public numbers stop at USD 399 per month. Starter at USD 99/mo bills yearly and buys ChatGPT tracking only, 50 prompts, 1,500 responses, one seat, one language, one region, and no exports or Prompt Volumes. The tier that looks like a usable multi-engine setup is Growth at USD 399/mo billed yearly: 3 engines, 100 prompts, 9,000 responses, 3 seats and CSV/JSON exports. A billed-yearly toggle recorded on 2026-06-11 showed USD 82.50 and USD 332.50, so verify the billing cadence before you quote a figure, and note that independent reviews list monthly billing as something not to expect on the self-serve plans. Enterprise is custom with no published rate, and third-party estimates of USD 2,000 to 5,000+ per month are an unconfirmed estimate rather than a vendor figure. There is no permanent free tier, the trial is 7 days on Growth, and the free AEO Report and agent trial are lead magnets rather than product trials. Profound's own review base scores it 3.2 for value for money and 3.0 for implementation.

AllAble

AllAble gives you visibility scoring and share of voice per keyword, brand citations, and competitor comparison on the same keyword, checked across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews with AI Mode coverage. The reason that is useful is where the data lives: tracking sits inside a per-project keyword database with volume, CPC, difficulty and intent, so a visibility gap can be matched directly against the keywords you already target and the pages you already have. If you want to see whether your [AI brand visibility](/blog/ai-brand-visibility/) matches your organic footprint, you can run both from one place. The honest limitation is real, and you should know it before you buy. There is no citation-authority index for the domains driving the answers, no hallucination detection, and sentiment and narrative analysis is not documented as a separate module. Answers are not captured in a browser, and the sampling methodology is not published, which is exactly what a serious buyer will ask about.

Pprofound

This is the strongest part of Profound's product, and it is deeper than AllAble. Citation analysis is separated from mention tracking, Citation Authority ranks the domains that drive answers, and FactCheck surfaces inaccurate claims along with the sources behind them. Sentiment and narrative themes sit alongside it, benchmarking spans platform, region and topic, and answers are captured in a browser rather than through API output, which is a meaningful methodological difference. Every tracked prompt runs daily, with published response volumes of 1,500 per month on Starter and 9,000 on Growth. Prompt Volumes adds demand data from 1.3B+ real user conversations, with content gap analysis showing high-volume prompts where competitors are cited instead of you, plus week-over-week prompt volume trends. Agent Analytics adds server-log AI crawler monitoring and AI traffic attribution. AllAble has no equivalent of Prompt Volumes, FactCheck or Citation Authority. If your program is judged on citation quality and governance reporting, Profound is the specialist, and the [LLM visibility tools](/blog/llm-visibility-tools/) market exists because that depth is hard to build.

AllAble

This is where the platform argument lands. Visibility insight flows into the keyword database, then into a content brief, then a draft, then images, then publication to WordPress or Payload CMS, with internal linking rules and cannibalization handling on the publishing side. Paid execution covers a Google Ads campaign builder with GAQL query access, search-term ingest and a campaign auditor, plus Meta Ads read-only, while social covers Instagram and Facebook publishing and scheduling. Image and asset generation is built in. The point is not that AllAble out-monitors Profound, because it does not. The point is that the insight and the fix sit in one subscription, so the loop from a competitor being cited where you are not, to the page that closes the gap being published, never leaves the workspace. A dashboard tells you. It does not do the work. If you already have a content team and a paid team, that difference matters less. If you are the team, it matters a lot. The [AI visibility tracker](/features/ai-visibility-tracker/) is the entry point, and the output ends up in your CMS, not in a screenshot.

Pprofound

Profound genuinely moved from monitoring into execution in February 2026 with Agents: pre-built templates, a drag-and-drop builder, content generation including briefs and AEO-optimized FAQ assets, optimization of already-published pages, PR workflows and monitoring agents, all with human-in-the-loop checkpoints, plus Profound Sheets for running agents at scale. Published counters claim 235,000+ unique Agents built and 120,000+ hours saved, and the vendor reports Statsig reached a 2x visibility increase in key categories in under a week. Treat all vendor outcome numbers as directional, because they are self-published without control periods. Onward publishing runs through integrations with WordPress, Contentful and Webflow rather than a native publishing workflow. What Profound does not offer is the marketing stack around it: no Google Ads auditing or search-term ingest, no social publishing, no image generation, no keyword database, no internal linking rules and no cannibalization work. If you already run a [best AI visibility tools](/blog/best-ai-visibility-tools/) stack with a CMS and a content team, that is a reasonable division of labor.

AllAble

Every AllAble plan starts with a 7-day free trial that gives you 750 credits and full access to the tier you chose. The card is required upfront and is charged on day 7, so decide inside the week, and there is no permanent free tier to fall back on. What makes that week productive is the credit model: one number covers every kind of work, with published equivalences, so you can see what your trial actually buys. Unused credits roll over on paid plans. Project memory carries your client context between sessions, and clients can join as free guests on their own login without consuming a seat, which matters if you are an agency. On the product side, the [AI visibility tracker](/features/ai-visibility-tracker/) is built so you can run a check for a keyword across the tracked surfaces in a single session with no separate accounts to connect. If you want a structured first pass, an [AI visibility audit](/blog/ai-visibility-audit/) is a reasonable way to spend the first day.

Pprofound

Vendor-reported onboarding is fast, with two paths: DIY self-serve and a tailored enterprise plan. Statsig is reported to have completed onboarding in two hours and doubled visibility in key categories in under a week, and a quoted customer describes setup as extremely easy with onboarding within a few days. Enterprise customers get a dedicated support specialist, an AEO strategist and a shared Slack channel with a 24-hour SLA. The friction sits in the trial and the tier ladder rather than in the interface. There is no permanent free tier, the trial is 7 days and applies to Growth, and independent reviewers call that a narrow window. The functional multi-engine entry is Growth at USD 399/mo billed yearly, not the USD 99 Starter, which is the single most common surprise for buyers comparing headline prices. Its independent review sub-scores are 3.8 for ease of use and 3.0 for implementation, so the interface is not the problem. Give Profound a full week on Growth before you commit to a year.

AllAble

AllAble connects Google Ads via OAuth with GAQL query access and search-term ingest straight into the keyword database, plus Google Search Console, GA4, WordPress publishing, Instagram and Facebook publishing and scheduling, and Meta Ads read-only, with a plugin and integration catalog surfaced on the pricing page. Reporting produces HTML dashboards and public share links that a client can open without a login, plus DOCX export for anyone who still needs a document. The honest limits are on the compliance and developer side. The role model covers owner, admin, member and viewer, but SSO and SOC 2 are not documented, and there is no published API for piping visibility data into an external warehouse. If you are a large enterprise with a security review, that is a genuine blocker and you should treat it as one. If you are a team that wants connected accounts working on day one and a client-ready report on day thirty, this covers the path. The [AllAble vs Semrush](/comparisons/semrush/) page covers the same question for the classic SEO stack.

Pprofound

Profound lists Akamai, AWS, Cloudflare, Fastly, Google Analytics, Google Cloud Platform, Netlify, Vercel and WordPress on every tier, plus native CMS integrations with Contentful and Webflow and a Google Search Node for agents. AI traffic attribution writes into Google Analytics and adjacent stacks through Agent Analytics, which is a stronger data path than a dashboard export. Exports are CSV and JSON from Growth upward. API access, SSO and SOC 2 are Enterprise only, as are multiple companies tracked and custom languages and regions. Documents and developer docs exist, and MCP support is third-party reported rather than vendor-published. The practical consequence for a data team: you cannot get visibility data into your own warehouse self-serve, you buy the Enterprise contract to do it. For an enterprise that already has that contract in place and a security team that needs SOC 2, this is the more complete answer, and the [AEO audit](/blog/aeo-audit/) work it supports is designed to run inside it.